California Department of Transportation

Noise and Vibration Studies Links

Division of Environmental Analysis (DEA) LINKS


square icon

Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view and print PDF files. Adobe Acrobat is required to edit online forms and save them to your computer.

Get Acrobat Reader Image

logo

Text Size [ + ] [ - ]
Background Color

Last Updated: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:13 AM

tool_box

Noise and Vibration Studies

new(3/14/08)"Annotated Noise Study Report (NSR)"

The Annotated Noise Study Report Outline is designed to provide a consistent format for the noise impact analysis required on highway projects. This outline should be used for all Type I projects that require NEPA compliance. The noise specialist should work closely with the Project Engineer to insure that all pertinent noise study information is include in the Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR). Click here to access the "Annotated Noise Study Report (NSR)"

Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (Protocol) - dated August 2006

2006 Protocol.zip (1.7 mb) includes 2006 Protocol, FHWA approval letter and NADR template.

Effective date for Protocol (August 2006) implementation are on noise studies started on or after October 1, 2006. In August of 2006 the FHWA approved a much-revised version of the 1998 Protocol for use on projects on the state highway system. This revision was intended to provide a more concise document for ease of use by non-technical readers. A major change in the policy document eliminates any significant discussion of NEPA or CEQA and focuses exclusively on Federal Code (Title 23 Part 772). The Draft environmental document will address other regulatory commitments regarding noise impacts. The following are some of the more significant changes to the Protocol.

  1. The Protocol now requires the use of a District Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) during the environmental process to document the following:
    1. Noise abatement reasonableness allowances - from the Noise Study Report
    2. Acoustic feasibility of noise abatement
    3. Locations and dimensions of evaluated noise barriers
    4. Engineering estimates of acoustically feasible noise abatement
    5. Other construction considerations related to noise barriers - i.e. known utilities, etc.
    6. Effects of abatement on other environmental resources - i.e. scenic views, biological, etc.
    7. The NADR recommendations are incorporated into the draft environmental document for public review. If the project does not have a publicly reviewed environmental document, the NADR can be used to solicit public comment. The NADR recommendation will become the final abatement recommendation unless changed during public review. The final noise abatement decision is ultimately included in the approved environmental document
    8. Click here to see the NADR frequently asked questions
  2. Type I Impacts were revised as follows:
    1. Timing for consideration - added language to include FONSI, Cat Ex
    2. Type I Project - added "full length" to ramp widening criteria
    3. Type I Definition - slightly revised to better capture intent
    4. Impact Prediction - added language to avoid model exceeding 500 ft
    5. Includes language to notify local agencies about predicted noise levels for land use planning.
  3. Defines FHWA TNM 2.5 as approved modeling software for noise studies on the state highway system.
  4. Extended abatement "life cycle" to a useful life of 20 years rather than the previous 15 years.
  5. Defines Project Development Team as abatement decision maker for final environmental document.
  6. Cost - establishes a new 2006 base allowance of $32k with annual adjustments determined by most recent annual Construction Price Index.

Some small typographical errors have been found in the new Protocol.  These are being accumulated and a revision will be forthcoming.  No major problems but as an example the requirement of a majority of affected residents approval for a wall was omitted from the Type I discussion.  This was an error and will be corrected.

Construction Cost Index for Noise Study - The 2005 annual cost index increased dramatically to 268.2 from 128.6 in 1998. As a result, we are updating the base reasonable allowance defined in the Protocol for noise abatement from $26,000 to a rounded value of $32,000. This value should be used for all projects with noise studies started on or after April 1, 2006.

Implementation of Traffic Noise Model (TNM 2.5) - The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on August 20, 2004 to change the national traffic noise model required for use on Federal Aid projects to TNM. In an agreement reached with FHWA, Caltrans has agreed to require all new project noise studies, beginning after January 15, 2005, to use TNM version 2.5 or later for acoustic modelling of traffic noise. The exception to this requirement is for a reevaluation noise study of a project that was originally modelled using Sound 32 or Sound 2000.

Publications

Noise and Vibration Technical Advisories have been posted at the publications web page.

The following publications pertaining to acoustical and vibration issues are available for downloading:

More publications can be viewed here.

Software

  • Sound 2000 has been released and it is available for downloading in the software section.
  • Sound 2000 is an interface upgrade of Sound 32. Sound 32 is the Caltrans version of the FHWA highway noise prediction program which is known as STAMINA 2.0/OPTIMA. Sound 2000 and Sound 32 are public domain software.

Prior downloading the software, read this license. If you agree to the terms of the agreement, click on "I AGREE TO THE ABOVE TERMS" at the end of the page.

Training Resources

The Division of Environmental Analysis has several on-line noise training modules for use by the public.

Recent Activities

Pavement Study

A study entitled "Contribution of Thin Lift Surface Treatments To the Abatement of Traffic Noise Over a Period of Five Years" is currently in progress. This study will examine the acoustic characteristics of various pavement surfaces and their impacts on the overall traffic noise levels. The acoustic properties of standard types of pavements and pavement treatments will be measured and compared over a five-year period. One of the objectives of this study is to use this information as a guide for mitigating traffic noise. As of June 2002, several AC pavements had been placed on a test section of roadway in the high desert of Los Angeles County. Plan sheets of the study location are available here. The USDOT Volpe Research Center has collected baseline roadside sound pressure measurements and a new approach for cross correlating this site with other locations is being developed.

Pavement/tire sound intensity measuring probe Roadside sound pressure measurements taken by USDOT Volpe Research Center personnel AC Project Location

Validation Study

The Division of Environmental Analysis has sponsored the validation study performed by the Volpe Center which is based in Cambridge, MA. The purpose of this study is to validate the results obtained by the Traffic Noise Model (TNM) which was developed by the Federal Highway Administration. The Volpe crew with the assistance of CalTrans personnel completed two phases of the study by recording noise and meteorological data at various locations in the Los Angeles and San Francisco area.

Analyzers collecting noise readings Met tower on the left and Mic tower on the right met tower at 5 feet setting up the GIS equipment

Contacts:

  • - Groundborn vibration issues/guidance, Noise Protocol, home insulation, noise contracts
  • - Pavement noise issues, truck noise mapping research, TNM 2.5 validation
  • - Bioacoustics, barotrauma, hydroacoustic issues, Noise training, contract support

For questions regarding the Noise and Vibration web page, contact the webmaster.